Introduction: In the realm of knowledge production, replicability has always been an important concept. Replicability refers to the ability to reproduce the same results or findings through repeated experiments or studies. In this TOK essay, we will explore whether replicability is necessary in the production of knowledge.
Body
Paragraph 1: One argument for the necessity of replicability in knowledge
production is that it ensures the reliability of the results. Replicability
allows for independent verification of findings, which increases confidence in
the validity of the knowledge (Faria & González-Monteagudo 2020, p 404).
This is particularly important in fields such as medicine and science, where
the results of studies can have serious consequences for human health and
wellbeing. Without replicability, it would be difficult to distinguish between
valid and invalid findings, and the potential for misinformation and harm would
increase (Poirier 2019, p. 5).
If you really need Reliable Writer, Place your Order with Confidence Over Fiverr
https://www.fiverr.com/nazishmarvi1/write-an-excellent-tok-essay-extended-essay-and-ia
Body
Paragraph 2: On the other hand, some argue that replicability may not always be
necessary for knowledge production. In certain fields, such as the arts or
humanities, replicability may not be possible or desirable (Lacey
2018, p. 3). For
example, a work of art or literature may not be able to be replicated in the
same way that a scientific experiment can be replicated. In these fields, the
focus may be on interpretation and subjective experience rather than objective
replication.
Body
Paragraph 3: Moreover, there are some instances where replicability may
actually hinder the production of knowledge (Nosek &
Bar-Anan, 2012, p. 5).
For example, in the study of complex social phenomena such as human behavior or
culture, replicability may not always be possible due to the unique and
ever-changing nature of these phenomena. In these cases, the focus may be on
generating new and unique insights rather than replicating existing findings.
Counterargument:
Some may argue that without replicability, knowledge production would be
unreliable and subjective (Kelland 2018, p. 4). They may point out that
replicability ensures that findings are consistent and can be verified by
multiple researchers, which is essential for building a body of knowledge that
is objective and reliable.
Conclusion: In conclusion, while replicability is an important concept in knowledge production, its necessity may depend on the field of study and the research question being investigated. In some cases, replicability may be essential for ensuring the reliability of findings, while in other cases, it may not be possible or desirable. It is important to carefully consider the role of replicability in each individual case to ensure that the knowledge produced is both reliable and valuable.
References
- Faria,
M. A., & González-Monteagudo, J. (2020). Replicability and
transparency in empirical psychology: A commentary on the recent debate.
Journal of Psychology, 154(5), 403-408.
- Kelland,
K. (2018). No replication needed: Controversial study on violent video
games is correct, researcher says. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-video-games-violence/no-replication-needed-controversial-study-on-violent-video-games-is-correct-researcher-says-idUSKCN1MK2QF
- Lacey,
N. (2018). Is replicability a necessary condition for knowledge?
Philosophy Now, 126, 16-18.
- Nosek,
B. A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012). Scientific utopia II. Restructuring
incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability.
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615-631.
- Poirier,
P. (2019). Replicability crisis: What it means and what we can do about
it. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/replicability-crisis-what-it-means-and-what-we-can-do-about-it-118167
0 Comments
If you have any suggestions, please comment