We have witnessed tragic events in different parts of the globe, like the 9/11 attacks in America and the Mumbai attack in India. These incidents were condemned, and it is right to condemn them. Recently, a conflict in occupied Palestine has gained attention, involving Hamas and Israel, leading to a complex and heartbreaking situation.

The conflict began as a response to a 75-year occupation, with Hamas expressing resistance on October 7. Unfortunately, this response took a distressing turn, leading to the loss of innocent lives. Reports tell of disturbing incidents, such as a girl being carried by Hamas fighters and the brutal killing of individuals.

Israel, in turn, responded, and it has been 40 days of intense conflict, resulting in the loss of over 12,000 Palestinian lives. The images emerging from the region are deeply disturbing, with reports of children being brutally slaughtered and the scarcity of essential supplies like water, food, and medical aid. The situation worsened when Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu referred to Palestinians as "human animals."

Some media outlets, particularly in India and the United States, draw parallels between this conflict and past incidents, like 9/11 and the Mumbai attacks. They suggest that Israel is taking revenge on Muslims, creating a narrative that echoes the idea of collective punishment. However, it's crucial to examine the unique aspects of each situation.

In contrast to India and the U.S., where terrorism struck and the attackers claimed responsibility, the Israel-Palestine conflict involves a long-standing territorial dispute. Israel, initially homeless, was given shelter by Palestine but is now seen as an occupier. Comparing these situations oversimplifies the complex history and dynamics at play.

Drawing parallels to past events, like the mosque attack in New Zealand, shows that terrorism knows no religion. It is dangerous to label an entire group based on the actions of a few individuals. The conflict in the Middle East is rooted in historical complexities, unlike the fight for independence in India and the U.S. against external forces.

The comparison with India and Pakistan gaining independence in 1947 falls short when considering the unique circumstances of the Israeli settlers. While India and Pakistan reclaimed their lands, Israelis became settlers on Palestinian territory, leading to a more intricate and ongoing struggle.

In conclusion, the Israel-Palestine conflict cannot be simplistically equated with past events in other parts of the world. The nuances of historical context, territorial disputes, and the complex nature of the conflict must be acknowledged for a more accurate understanding. Simplifying these matters risks perpetuating misleading narratives that hinder the prospects for a just and lasting resolution.